Podcast: Strategies for building a sustainable future
Key Highlights
- ESG is shifting from voluntary to regulated, requiring proactive compliance and stronger data systems.
- Supply chain visibility is critical to managing risk, emissions, and human rights obligations.
- Cross-functional collaboration is essential for effective ESG reporting and execution.
- Sustainability delivers value through efficiency, risk reduction, and stronger customer relationships.
In this episode of Great Question: A Manufacturing Podcast, EHS Today's Nicole Stempak talks with experts from BSI (www.bsigroup.com) about the current landscape of ESG, sustainability, and environmental regulations, emphasizing practical strategies for businesses to navigate complex compliance and leverage sustainability for business value.
Below is an excerpt from the podcast:
Nicole Stempak: It's great to have you here. For our listeners, can you please introduce yourself and briefly explain your role?
Shanayia (Shay) Munoz: I can go first. I'm Shay Munoz. I've been with BSI for seven years as a consultant on our sustainability practice. I have a background in environmental science and lead our sustainability strategy and reporting services. So essentially helping companies across their sustainability journey, oftentimes EHS.
Professionals that get tasked with sustainability. I typically start with helping them to identify the issues that are material to their organization based on their operations, supply chain, geography, different reporting requirements they may have, and then help them kind of build practical strategies and the implementation plans by setting goals, prioritizing actions and aligning with their available resources and timelines, and then eventually translating that into actual reporting, whether that's for voluntary disclosures like CDP and EcoVadis sustainability reports or regulatory requirements like California climate disclosures or the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive.
Kimberly Rodriguez: My name is Kimberly Rodriguez. You can call me Kimi for short, and I'm also a consultant at BSI Sustainability Consulting Practice. My background is in business and human rights. I completed my MBA focusing on global human rights and how that applies in the business case, and navigate responsible sourcing programs and help them manage and mitigate human rights and environmental risks across their supply chains.
NS: Okay, so before we do a deep dive, let's take a broad look at the landscape of ESG, sustainability, and the environment. So where do things stand and where are they headed?
SM: It's definitely a rapidly evolving space. One of the biggest shifts we're seeing is from voluntary action to regulatory expectation. Sustainability used to be largely driven by customer demand, and, you know, that's still true, but now regulation is catching up pretty quickly.
We're also seeing a lot of the conversation expand beyond just greenhouse gas emissions, which I think has been a really big focal point. And, you know, that's obviously not going away as well. But we're seeing a lot of companies also starting to focus more on, you know, financial risk and business value, as well as supply chain impacts, especially around scope three, because that can be really difficult to kind of get your arms around and manage. And then also looking into the other types of like resource constraints like water. So it's really becoming much more integrated into kind of the core business strategy and not just a side initiative or kind of like a checkbox exercise.
KR: Yes, definitely agree with Shay. And you know, I think we can't ignore the fact that there's been undoubtedly a lot of movement in the global ESG landscape in the last year and a half, which has been heavily influenced by geopolitical forces. And as Shay mentioned as well, consumer driven forces. I would say the last five or so years since you realized a growth spurt and a number of regulations, certifications, acronyms. It really was like an alphabet soup, I would say. Like, I think everyone was having a really difficult time managing, because also all the letters were kind of the same. So, you know, everyone would be using environmental development, et cetera. So there was an explosion of that.
I think we're seeing a bit more consolidation of these objectives as well into more, for example, standard reporting requirements, seeing things become more enshrined in regulations in either like national or like state level laws. So we're seeing kind of like, okay, here's everything and actually more of a focusing in on what the stakeholders that are affected by these regulations I think we to focus on. And I think despite all of these changes, despite all these different swings, ESG is still really key to a lot of the clients we've been working with. The messaging may have changed along with the current climate, but we found that in at least our day-to-day, there is still a big recognition that sustainability, ESG is a big driving force for better business and for better impacts.
NS: It's so great to be talking with you both in April, which is Earth Month. We've certainly come a long way from the first celebration of Earth Day, you know, with the campus teach-ins across campuses in April 1970, which, I mean, it's hard to believe, but that was several months before the formation of the US Environmental Protection Agency and the signing of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. And it was even a few years before the passage of the Clean Water and Clean Air Acts. What do you think listeners ought to know about the modern environmental movement and other legislative efforts to protect our lands and conserve our natural resources?
SM: It's never been more relevant than it is today. We're, you know, operating in a very fast moving, high consumption world. We're constantly sourcing, producing, and scaling. So being more intentional about those activities is extremely critical today. And then at the same time, it can feel very overwhelming, especially for companies that are really focused on growth. That's where, you know, sustainability needs to be practical and impactful. It's about helping businesses balance environmental responsibility with operational and financial realities. And, you know, regardless of where people stand on the causes, we're clearly seeing more extreme weather and disruption. And that creates real tangible risk for businesses today that they really need to be mindful of and just you need to know how to kind of understand them, manage them, and mitigate them.
KR: Yes, and I think building on to that, you know, think talking about like a very high consumption of society today, I think there's been a movement towards focusing on the circular economy, looking to look at how do looking at life cycle impacts on the products we consume, how we conduct business like there wasn't before, whereas in the past, I think the focus of conservation movements was just to protect our lands, protect their resources. Now, there's a lot more focus on how do we use these resources, how do we ensure that these resources are still there and present for future generations.
And yeah, and as Shay mentioned as well, you know, there's been really extreme climate impacts that we're seeing day to day and that, you know, we can't ignore the science behind these or ignore how they affect so many different communities, whether they be vulnerable communities that have already been impacted by other layers of, you know, today's society, economic, social, etc. And then environmental access is another layer. But just thinking about how do we preserve these resources for the future is, I think, what is becoming really key. And there is a business case for sustainability. I think that that is the recognition of that is also very important that yes, these effects, these environmental effects can't be divorced from how businesses, companies are conducting amid the current operations, and there is a demand for this. Like, I think there's a lot of different reports. I was just at a conference 2 weeks ago at a business school that looks at consumer reports, looks at stakeholder views and sustainability, and there is an increase in demand for sustainable products and, like, real in a verifiable sustainable products.
I think there was a time when greenwashing was, or kind of, you know, when you say you're sustainable, then I kind of the marketing of it was the main focus, but now there's a lot more resources being put in to make sure that your claims are verifiable.
NS: Can you give listeners an overview of what you're seeing at the federal and state level in the U.S. and what you're seeing in other countries too?
SM: In the US, we're seeing a lot of more state level leadership, especially in California with the climate disclosure laws, and then various other states with the extended producer responsibility laws focused more so on material sourcing and waste. And then just continued focus overall on kind of the traditional environmental and worker safety compliance more at the federal level. You know, hoping at some point that, you know, the regulations that are going into effect in California are really focused on reporting your greenhouse gas emissions and reporting on, you know, the risks associated with climate change expand eventually, but we're definitely seeing, you know, in other territories such as in the EU or, you know, many different countries all over the world, it's a bit more aggressive. The EU, you know, has already been rolling out comprehensive reporting requirements like the CSRD. And then there's, you know, many supply chain laws focused on human rights and due diligence, which, you know, I'm sure Kimi can give a great overview about those.
But if even if you are just based in the US and you're a US based company, if you sell into Europe, if you operate in California, or if you're a supplier to any of these large companies that are, you know, impacted by these different regulations, you're likely already going to be pulled into these requirements. It's going to, you know, have a trickle down effect. I'm sure a lot of companies are already experiencing this. So it's really important to be very proactive and, you know, keep your finger on the pulse when it comes to these regulations all over the world.
KR: Nothing much to add there. I think, even though that these regulations are being more aggressive, the EU and Australia and Japan and Asia, we're seeing a lot more movement in those regions of the world, whereas in the US is more state level at this point. A lot of companies, a lot of organizations are still being affected those of other countries, specifically even looking at forced labor. I think that right now the US, like the Uyghur Forced Labor Act, or the UFLPA, is one of its regulations that are consistently applied. And I think does pressure companies to really look at their forced labor due diligence, because if you are founded forced labor from a very specific region in Xinjiang, China, you are not allowed to export into the US and they hold your shipment on the border and they do not let it into US territory, which can have a huge financial impact on companies. So the way some of these regulations are enforced are also very important, I think, to look at and include in a company's response to compliance.
NS: You both have touched on this, which is that there's a patchwork of laws. And so how can businesses make sure that they're following the laws in the states and or countries where they are doing business where they're sourcing materials from to make sure they're not, you know, even inadvertently in violation.
SM: It's best to kind of simplify this process as much as possible. And I'm sure that sounds, you know, impossible potentially when you're kind of just starting to look at it. But I think maybe these three steps can kind of help. So, you know, first is definitely to try to get some clarity on what actually applies to you. So, you know, a lot of companies get really overwhelmed if they're trying to track everything globally. Well, I think it's important to have a global picture of what's going on, but to be working with professionals and experts in the area that can really help you kind of narrow it down for what's applicable to you. And really what you should be looking at is just like where you operate, where you sell and who you supply that should really help you be able to narrow that down and kind of get your arms around it a little bit better.
Second, I would say to map your operations and supply chain. That's where a lot of the risk sits today. And if you don't know where your materials are coming from or where your products are going, you can't really assess compliance. So that's really important to understand your full value chain.
And then third, I would say to build a simple and repeatable process. You don't need, you know, a perfect system on day one, but you do need a way to consistently track these things, especially as it comes to, you know, different ESG metrics. So like energy use, emissions, your materials, supplier data. It's really important to have a kind of, you know, comprehensive platform or some means to be able to track all this information because that's typically a big piece of the undertaking is just managing all of that data. And then, you know, companies that do this well, they really treat compliance less like a one-time exercise and more like an ongoing management system, which is very similar to how safety or quality teams would typically approach this work. So it's really just like an add-on to work. I think that, you know, a lot of folks within the EHS space are already used to, but just kind of adapting it more to like the environmental sustainability world.
KR: I would add to build cross-functionality among all the different themes that Shay mentioned as well, that I think a lot of these regulations, all of these ESG regulations aren't just for the sustainability team to follow. I think that they touch a lot of parts of the business. For example, procurement, of course, and then finance, even EHS, health and safety that may not feel like they need to report, for example, on greenhouse gas emissions. There's data that they have that could potentially support this company-wide reporting.
So I think building on to, yeah, what Shay discussed, I would definitely think about how do you build, discuss functionality and make sure that your teams are talking to each other, sharing the correct data that these knowledge systems or the data is not in silos or or just resides, you know, with one person handling the handling where the data sets and controlling access to that data, because at the end of the day, when you're looking to comply with these different regulations, when you're looking for the data that you need to show, to show compliance, to show movement, to show progress, whatever it is, you need to have this, you know, the right people on your team and to be able to get this across the business quite easily. So I think just making sure that the right people across the business are familiar, that they're talking to each other, and that, yeah, this is really a cross-functional exercise and not just... you know, one sustainability team or one sustainability person.
And I think just to give, sorry, a quick example, actually one of the projects that we're working on right now at a pharmaceutical company, it's a, you know, it's in response to an ESG regulation or, you know, a regulation that would be classified as ESG, but we're actually working with our health and safety team because there's parts of it that they are in charge of. And so, you know, I think sometimes we get questions from. our EHS team, because BSI also has an HS and consulting arm that we do work together with. They get questions from their own clients being like, hey, I didn't realize, but this was a, you know, they're asking something about chemicals or something about this piece of the CSRD requirement. We didn't even know it applied to us. Can you help us with this? So I think just understanding how different functions can work together to respond to these regulations is a key learning.
NS: I'm glad that you brought that up because I did want to ask in your consulting work, where do you see businesses focusing their efforts and attention?
SM: I guess a few big areas that I've seen, and this is really just, you know, probably like the biggest ones that I'll call out because there's obviously so many of them. But really, like greenhouse gas accounting and decarbonization, this has been kind of the front runner and obviously, you know, is still a very big important sustainability issue from, you know, a voluntary perspective, from your customer expectations and what they're requiring for you to report on and now from a regulatory perspective. So really just kind of figuring out the company's baseline emissions and then improving upon that process on an annual basis and then working towards, you know, eventually understanding where your hotspots are for your emissions and being able to then, you know, reduce your emissions as well.
And then another big one would probably be supply chain engagement. So really working with your suppliers to obtain different types of, you know, environmental, social, and governance information from them. So whether that's related to scope 3 and getting emissions data from your suppliers, whether that's getting information regarding different types of materials that you're sourcing, whether it's, you know, focused on the work that Kimi does around, you know, human rights and due diligence, but really just assessing and reducing the overall risk within your supply chain. And then also, you know, regulatory readiness and continuous improvement. So especially, you know, for state level reporting and EU requirements. This is, you know, a big undertaking for a lot of our clients. And so this is something that they have to be very proactive about, ensuring that they're tracking all these different regulations, understanding how they apply to them, and then implementing the systems to then manage them.
KR: Yeah, all of that. And I think we could add traceability as well. I think there's been quite a few traceability regulations and I think how this applies to an organization sustainability commitments has been really interesting. Like I think different companies are approaching traceability differently. Some are just looking at it from a provenance perspective, but there is kind of a lifecycle analysis perspective, a human rights perspective to it as well, a social perspective. So I think that has been an area of growth that we've seen, especially in the last year and seeing how that applies to different businesses and applies to the data source they have has been really interesting.
NS: So on the flip side, I'm curious to hear what's something you think that businesses maybe aren't focusing on but should.
SM: This is something that's been coming up a lot lately in the work that I'm doing is that a lot of companie are getting tasked with work for sustainability, and they're kind of like trying to understand what is the value that it brings to their organization or communicate like why they're doing this beyond just like a checkbox exercise or, you know, meeting compliance. They need to be able to communicate to their senior leaders, you know, what is the value that this work brings beyond, you know, it being like a cost or a compliance burden. And I think when it's done right, it can really help, you know, depending on what it is exactly that you're doing, but, you know, it can reduce energy and material costs, it can improve operational efficiency, it can strengthen customer relationships that then help you to maintain a preferred supplier status or, you know, maintain contracts with your large, you know, key customers. So there's a lot of different sources of value that it brings. And I think by partnering with experts in this space who do understand that value, this can then help you just communicate that even more internally on, you know, why there's such a business case to focus on sustainability. And you know what areas to really tackle to help ensure that you are maximizing that value as well.
KR: I think that companies are also struggling with resourcing for to address all of these sustainability issues. I think a lot of the times we're working with one or two people, the sustainability team, they just don't have either the capital to do this work as thoroughly as they want to or the people to do this work. So I think we that's why we're here to support them as well to expand their capabilities to address these different ESG issues. I would say as well that I think another area that companies struggle with is really providing or having a holistic approach to ESG where they're thoroughly considering environmental and social impacts. I think right now is very much separated and there's a lot of overlapping risk, for example, or a lot of like similar have things that you can leverage across each to tackle the impacts from each focus area, like ES&G. But right now, it's very siloed, not just, you know, in business impacts, but even in the people working on these issues. Sometimes, you know, a company or an organization will say, oh, we're the sustainability team, we're working on sustainability issues, but it's only greenhouse gas.
And you know, the human rights piece is completely separated out. And I think just understanding that these are related, that they are under one, you know, sustainability bucket is still something that we find that we're helping companies through.
NS: That makes me think of something about maturity, right? Like, these are not completely new fields, but they aren't as defined as, say, you know, mathematics, right, that we've had for centuries. And so just building up expertise and resources, you know, within a company and figuring out how to build this into an existing workflow. Like Kim, you were talking about how some people might not realize this is ESG versus EHS and the acronyms being very similar with different areas of focus. What are you seeing in terms of maturity and size or growth or any kind of thing with the companies that you're consulting with?
SM: I tend to work with a lot of companies who are more mid-sized and they're coming, you know, kind of at the beginning of their maturity journey. And so I'm working with a lot of folks who, you know, they just got tasked with sustainability. This is not like their day-to-day job necessarily. Like maybe they do operations, maybe they do facilities, maybe they do EHS, and this is just like another thing put on their plate to manage. And so I think that, you know, a lot of the work that we do is just ensuring that they have the right knowledge to be able to tackle it. They understand like, what is the purpose of the work that they're doing? What is the impact that it can have on their day to day, how can we help them prioritize actions so they're not trying to tackle everything all at once. And then ensure that they have the necessary resources as Kimmy kind of spoke to earlier. You know, this is, it's a lot and it can be a little bit overwhelming.
And I think it is so important to ensure that you are partnering with someone or pulling in the right resources that have that knowledge that, you know, you can expand the bandwidth and it's not all on one person because oftentimes we do see it falling on one or two people or, you know, a very small team, at least when you're starting out, you know, at the early stages of maturity. And so, you know, as the company starts to integrate this and understand, you know, the reasoning, and the importance of the work that they're doing, then, you know, they can eventually start to expand their maturity, gain more resources. But I think understanding where you're starting from and how to maximize that. And yeah, again, just like communicate that up to senior leaders in a really effective way to continue that great work is super important and making sure that yeah, you have someone on your side to help you do all those things as well.
KR: I would say that a lot of the companies and clients that I'm working that I've been working with have been more than mature side of ESG, I think, because when I when you're looking to responsible sourcing programs, sustainable sourcing supply chain engagement, there's already a foundation of ESG usually before a company goes out to look for support in building these programs out. I mean, it is, you know, when we talk about sustainable supply chains, I think we like to talk a bit talk about it as a jigsaw puzzle in a sense where, you know, I think you can, when you're building out a jigsaw puzzle, when you're building out what your sustainable or a supply chain or what some supply chain due diligence looks like for your company.
You know, sometimes you start in one aspect, sometimes you start in like the corner, you look at the corner pieces, those are a bit easier to build out. And then maybe the pieces that have like very similar colors are harder to build out. Like, you know, a company can have like maybe these, you know, four corners built out, so they can have maybe a risk assessments, for example, training programs, they have supplier CAPs or corrective action plans, but they might not have a good way to like manage the reporting. So, you know, they can be mature in some aspects, but immature or, you know, needs improvement and other aspects. But a lot of the companies that at least I've been working on have like, you know, two or three of these, you know, I would say jigsaw pieces more or less there. And then we can help them focus their resource and then on what's missing. And I think to build on to that, you know, when an organization is looking at sustainable sourcing. That's really like they've already established supplier relationships. They already have some kind of vendor onboarding process. They already have targets, hopefully, that they want to reach with their sustainability initiatives. And it's, you know, us stepping in and helping them see how they can, how they can leverage what their, what their strengths are to bring their suppliers to where they need to be and to where their expectations are.
I think another example of this is that, you know, a lot of the companies who are building out these programs, they usually start with, okay, what is this, what does your supplier code of conduct look like? What do your supplier agreements look like? And typically these companies already have an internal code of conduct or a or maybe sustainability targets that we can then import into their supplier requirements and just make sure that those are aligned. So I think that, you know, what we're talking about, these companies, they already have something in place, they already have goals they're trying to reach towards, but now want to take the next step to be, to become either a leader in their field or closer to the leader in that field just comes to show that, you know, sustainability, whether you're very immature and starting to process, or a bit further along and, you know, have some processes in place, there's always more to be done.
SM: And I think just one point to that, sorry, is just ensuring that you have a strong foundation to begin with, right? I think a lot of companies do have like ad hoc things potentially, whether it's a health and safety program that you can build off of, they may already have kind of like the systems and foundation in place. So looking at like what they have in place, and then being able to build off of that is, you know, really important.
NS: I did want to ask, Shay, you help make sure corporate sustainability strategies, policies, and reports are in accordance with regulations. Do you have any advice for listeners who may be new and, you know, possibly overwhelmed by sustainability reporting standards and disclosures?
SM: I would say just start simple. I think it's really important. And as to like Kim, Kim, we spoke earlier about the overlap between a lot of these different regulations and reporting frameworks be able to kind of identify those overlaps. That's going to help streamline that process A lot. And then once you've identified the overlaps and then maybe, you know, the areas that are different, you can conduct a gap assessment. I feel like this is like such a strong starting point to help you really understand what you already have in place, what you can build off of, again, like what types of foundations that you have currently, and then what is missing and really needs to be implemented, and then when, understanding the timeline of when it can happen. So that can help you kind of prioritize those different pieces that need to be implemented as well, like what's more pressing versus what are areas that you kind of have and can build off of. And then I'd also recommend just building a solid data foundation, focusing on consistency and improvement year over year.
As I said earlier, data and obtaining data, especially when it's coming from many different pieces of your organizations or even outside of your organization from different suppliers or business partners, it can be a lot. So having a really solid data foundation and knowing exactly what type of data you need is very important, but then also improving over that and improving the quality of that year over year and maybe not trying to improve all the quality, within one year, because that's not necessarily attainable, but focusing on pieces at a time. And then, yeah, again, you know, a lot of these reporting requirements and frameworks have overlap. So if you build things out the right way up front, you can then reuse this or reuse that work across, you know, multiple different disclosures. So it helps you to align them all to this is relevant for this, this is relevant for this. And then you'll know kind of like where all your reporting is, have it consolidated, and then also pull it apart as you need to.
NS: Kimi, you focus on some things that businesses maybe haven't had to worry about in the past, you know, materiality assessments and supply chain human rights. You know, how is this new level of accountability changing the way companies do business, if at all?
KR: I think Shay talked about the materiality assessment is an important, you know, why we need to have these gap assessments in place and how that can strengthen a lot of the foundation of businesses like sustainability strategies. And I think that the work that I've been doing around supply chain human rights, funnily enough, actually, if you look at the evolution of sustainability regulations, the human rights and forced labor regulations were actually there much earlier than environmental ones. I think they've evolved a lot over the last few years, but, you know, I think if you look at the UK Modern Slavery Act, the Australian Modern Slavery Act, these precedes a lot of the greenhouse gas accounting and regulations that we're, you know, seeing as a bigger focus today, despite the fact that they've been around for a while, I think they just haven't been, as you mentioned, Nicole, like the kind of maybe the central focus point of a lot of how businesses operate.
So I would say that how it's really been changing how companies approach ESG is that these social requirements or these considerations of human rights, social impacts, and how they are layered over environmental impacts are no longer a nice to have, but kind of a need to have, whether that be because of regulations being enshrined, consumer requirements, or just, you know, becoming more central to business needs. And, you know, we're seeing a movement away from this being a marketing initiative or like as you mentioned earlier, like a green greenwash initiative to really be integrated into a company's like procurement policies. Like we're seeing a lot more procurement teams looking, you know, adding sustainability as a criteria for venue onboarding, like, whereas in the past it was truly just price and quality. And, you know, for a lot of companies that still might be the case, you know, as companies are mature through adding an element of sustainability, whether that be human rights requirements, environmental requirements, environmental targets, et cetera, that that is becoming a key part of procurement processes. So it's really, you know, being built into companies' longer-term strategy. That's not just like, you know, an ad hoc initiative or a one-time project.
And, you know, I think it's kind of been nice to be working with a lot in an environment where you no longer need to convince an industry that this is important, but rather that it's been accepted at human rights, environmental considerations are an important part of, you know, procurement, sourcing, et cetera. Now the next step is like, is more solid action towards, yeah, truly making an impact in these spaces and truly accepting it as a as a business risk and a business opportunity.
NS: Before we go, I wanted to ask if there is anything else you'd like to add that we haven't discussed yet, or some final words of wisdom you'd like to share with listeners this Earth Month?
SM: I just like to say, as just like a final piece of advice is really just to not overcomplicate it. You know, a lot of this probably feels kind of new, or, you know, there's different teams that are getting tasked or being pulled in, I guess, to sustainability work. But if you really think about it, it's an extension of the things that I'm sure our audience is already doing, whether that's, you know, managing risk, improving efficiency, keeping people safe, mitigating, you know, impacts on the environment. So sustainability, when you're looking at it holistically, it's just kind of expanding that lens a bit more. And then the companies that approach it in that way, not as, you know, separate initiatives, but more so as part of how they run their business, are the ones that tend to get the most value out of it as well.
KR: I would say as well that sustainability can be, you know, every job is a sustainability job, like whether you're in finance, whether in procurement, you might think it has nothing to do with sustainability. I think if you really review what the what the objectives are of your sustainability strategy or you know how you can make an impact in your day-to-day role that you can make your job a sustainability job. I think a lot of the practitioners we've been working with, no one didn't start in sustainability. They weren't like a sustainability analyst because those didn't really exist 20 years ago, but now they've kind of found their way on how to, or they found how they can infuse sustainability in their current roles in that company, wherever that be. So just to encourage listeners that, you know, if you don't have sustainability in your title, don't fret, you know, you can make your job. It's a sustainability job and there's multiple avenues in which you can do that.
About the Podcast
Great Question: A Manufacturing Podcast offers news and information for the people who make, store and move things and those who manage and maintain the facilities where that work gets done. Manufacturers from chemical producers to automakers to machine shops can listen for critical insights into the technologies, economic conditions and best practices that can influence how to best run facilities to reach operational excellence.
Listen to another episode and subscribe on your favorite podcast app
About the Author
Nicole Stempak
Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.


