Podcast: From prototypes to production — The practical advantage of 3D printing
Key takeaways
- Additive manufacturing (AM) enables rapid prototyping, reducing lead times and accelerating product development.
- Hybrid workflows using AM and CNC boost precision, efficiency, and material utilization in production.
- AM allows cost-effective low-volume production, ideal for complex parts in aerospace, automotive, and medical sectors.
- Integrating AM with digital tools supports agile, data-driven manufacturing aligned with Industry 4.0 goals.
In this episode of Great Question: A Manufacturing Podcast, Robert Brooks, editor in chief of American Machinist and Foundry Management and Technology, reviews the additive manufacturing (AM) market. Drawing from Patrick Wirt’s article "Bridging the Gap Between Prototypes and Production," the discussion highlights how AM technologies enhance speed, flexibility, and cost-efficiency in prototyping and low-volume production. The conversation also touches on the integration of AM within hybrid manufacturing models and digitalized production environments. Together, they offer a clear-eyed perspective on how additive manufacturing complements — rather than replaces — traditional methods in today’s manufacturing landscape.
Below is an edited excerpt from the podcast:
Recently there has emerged some concern or confusion about whether U.S. import tariffs on steel and aluminum will affect prototype products made in those materials, which is worth a separate discussion, but Patrick Wirt's article preceded that for us. His focus is on prototyping, however, which is why I bring it to your attention. I view the article as a helpful return to baseline for additive manufacturing after several years of organizational turmoil among the top suppliers of AM systems. That turmoil had virtually nothing to do with AM processes or technology developments, and it had almost everything to do with the finances of that industrial sector.
Now here I'm editorializing to add that the organization and finances of the additive manufacturing and 3D printing sector had been distorted because investors were impatient with the rate of adoption of those technologies among manufacturers worldwide. Those backers wanted additive manufacturing and 3D printing to be much more disruptive to manufacturing than it has been. (There are numerous reports that americanmachinist.com and foundrymag.com describing all those developments since 2022.) But that upheaval has stabilized since the start of this year, I'm glad to report.
The latest issue of the Wohlers Report, which is the most widely recognized source of additive manufacturing market intelligence, offers that in 2024 the global AM industry reached $21.9 billion in market value, up 9.1% from 2023. The new total included $4.44 billion from material sales, $6 billion from machine sales and related services, $10.1 billion from printing services, and $1.4 billion in sales from software. Most of the growth for the a ministry last year was centered in Asia, especially in China. Wohlers reports that for Europe there was just moderate growth in the additive manufacturing sector but in North America there was negative growth, so the additive manufacturing sector needs more European and North American adopters of their technologies.
This is the reason that Patrick Wirt’s article at americanmachinist.com is relevant, particularly in the context of import tariffs, which many machine shops and other manufacturers may anticipate will draw more inquiries for their services. This article makes the case a current one, but referencing factors that have been well established that adopting additive manufacturing and 3D printing has practical advantages that support and enhance established manufacturing operations.
I quote the author: