Survey: Many women believe they are not smart enough to pursue a STEM career

A recent survey, which looked into the public perceptions and knowledge around STEM revealed some novel insights about gender differences in the perception of STEM.

By Anna Powers for Forbes

It is a known fact that women are underrepresented in the STEM fields, comprising about only a quarter of the workforce. Previously, I written about the benefit of getting more women engaged in the STEM fields, both from an economic and societal perspective. Considering that innovation in the STEM fields drives the backbone of our economy and that the most lucrative majors are in the STEM fields, getting more women in STEM has tremendous benefit for women, such as gaining financial independence, potentially closing the gender pay gap and an opportunity to shape the world.

A recent survey, which looked into the public perceptions and knowledge around STEM revealed some novel insights about gender differences in the perception of STEM. The survey asked 1,030 individuals over the age of 18 in the United States to answer questions in regard to STEM. Although the sample is not representative of the whole US population, it was selected to match the US population along lines of gender, regions, age groups and ethnicities.

One interesting finding is of those who said they were not smart enough to pursue a career in STEM, 60% were women while 40% were men. These finding indicates that women have a diminished perception of their ability to do well in STEM subjects. The question of course arises as to why? Although the answer is multifactorial, a piece of research that aims to answer that question looks at how negative stereotypes affect performance in academic setting. Professor Greg Walton from Stanford University published a study which aimed to understand the stereotype threat and overall scholastic performance. The study suggested "that standard measures of academic performance are biased  against women in quantitative fields" due to the stereotype threat, rather than actual ability or potential. The authors indicate that people who face reoccurring negative stereotypes threats have their real world performance undermined and underestimated as the result of the psychological effect of the stereotype. Another study carried out by Professor Greg Walton looked at SAT performance in math and found that due to the negative stereotype and "psychological threat accounts for 57–94% of the gender gap on the SAT-Math test." The findings are both illuminating and shocking. Both results of the survey and the research indicate that women may feel diminished confidence in their abilities, but this in fact is not due to their innate abilities, rather their perception thereof, which influenced by societal factors.

To learn more, read "60% Of Women Don't Think They Are Smart Enough To Pursue A Career In STEM, A New Survey Shows" by Anna Powers for Forbes.

About the Author

Alexis Gajewski

Alexis Gajewski

Senior Content Strategist

Alexis Gajewski is a manufacturing writer and editor with nearly 20 years of experience covering the people, practices, and technologies that keep industrial facilities running. For more than a decade, she served as Senior Content Strategist for Plant Services, creating content for plant managers, engineers, and maintenance professionals on a variety of industrial topics.

During her tenure, Alexis worked to develop the brand’s digital strategy and helped launch and produce Great Question: A Manufacturing Podcast. She also created The Lighter Side of Manufacturing, a weekly blog that explored the inventive and sometimes humorous side of the industry. 

Alexis co-founded Influential Women in Manufacturing, a recognition program that honored 49 women in its first two years, earned an industry award for Best Product Launch, and received a proclamation from Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and a commendation from U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth.

She also led newsroom operations and development at a large media company where she set editorial standards, developed training curriculum, and helped support AI adoption for more than 150 editors across 80+ brands spanning manufacturing, industrial processing, automation, and more.

Additionally, Alexis works as a freelance writer and editor, and her areas of interest include continuous improvement, the skilled workforce, and the role of emerging technology on the plant floor.

Connect with Alexis on LinkedIn

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates