Intelligent inventory management

Sept. 12, 2018
In this installment of Automation Zone, learn how automating procurement processes can yield significant savings.

From the birth of civilization, fuel and energy have formed the backbone as crucial components for economic growth. Historically and even now, owners have longed for optimization of their plant’s lifecycle cost, which is eventually a function of total installed cost and operational cost. For the latter, companies are continually seeking new opportunities to make existing processes more efficient by reducing their costs. Greater reliability and increased efficiency calls for more plant instrumentation to ensure continuous operation, and thus timely availability of spares is required.

About the Author: Anand Srivastava, Pramod Gupta, and Sheikh Rafik Manihar Ahmed

Anand Srivastava works in project management at Fluor Daniel in New Delhi, India. He has 15 years of professional experience in project management, FEED, detail engineering and design, procurement, field engineering, proposal development, and construction for oil & gas, petrochemical and chemical projects.

Pramod Gupta works in project controls at Fluor Daniel in New Delhi, India. He has 23 years of industry experience spanning project planning, scheduling, monitoring & controls, project execution, and project management.

Sheikh Rafik Manihar Ahmed is control systems engineer and innovation catalyst at Fluor Daniel in New Delhi, India. He has professional experience in instrumentation, FEED, detail design and engineering, procurement, inspection and field engineering.

Predicting the availability of the right spare at the right time can aid in reducing production losses and will help owners achieve operational excellence.

The oil and gas sector in India during FY17 had a capacity of 234.5 MMTPA; this rose to 247.5 MMTPA by year’s end. Refineries operate with big numbers, and crude prices over two decades have fluctuated from $32 to $140 per barrel, with a 52-week high of $70.80 and a 52-week low of $45.13.

The variations in crude prices affect gross refining margins (GRM) and subsequently the downstream market. The national oil company (NOC) and private companies do not have control over crude prices. They can only adopt “best practices” to reduce operational expenditures, implement innovative solutions, reduce maintenance costs, and avoid unplanned shutdowns, etc.

This column will address the latter actions – reducing maintenance costs by lowering inventory levels and using the reasons behind prior unplanned shutdowns as triggers to avoid future trips.

The long-relied-upon conventional approach is based on the reactive methodology – an instrument is fixed when it fails. Its recent incorporation of preventive maintenance techniques gives it a more-robust architecture to achieve reliability.

Though the conventional methodology remains popular, there are several possibilities for improvement. To name a few:

  1. Automatic placing of orders for spares (including technical and commercial bid evaluation, placement of purchase orders, expediting, etc.)
  2. Automatic procedure for notifying the storeroom to dispatch materials to the plant/unit
  3. In-built predictive triggers on inventory levels

The suggested Futuristic Methodology will utilize advance triggers from field instruments (predictive diagnosis), a preventive maintenance schedule, and a database of the failure history of instruments. It will also link the plant control system to enterprise resource planning (ERP) software for automating the process. Upon implementation, this new approach will:

  1. Automate the procedure of notifying the storeroom and the maintenance team in advance based on triggers. The triggers are either generated in the plant control system or through notifications for preventive maintenance in an ERP tool.
  2. Automate the procedure for placing orders for spares depending upon predetermined reorder levels and trigger-based advance requirement.

This is the era of smart instruments: i.e., instruments capable of detecting their own health status – of performing self-diagnostics. The instruments can continue to provide a valid output but may eventually lose their needed operability because of external or internal reasons. This may act as a trigger of a “would-be” requirement of maintenance prior to a scheduled one or an indication of a “would-be” trip.

To achieve greater reliability, the critical element is basic field instrument performance. If we further break down a reliable operating system to measurable chunks, we reach a finite level, and that is field instruments.

Historical data also substantiates that an instrument is sometimes the cause of a major shutdown and hence the reason for production losses. One worldwide example is the famous Buncefield Oil Explosion where a level instrument cost approximately £10 million to the owners.

Triggers are logged in the plant control system, which in turns handshakes with the ERP system to validate the reorder levels/reorder quantities. If the reorder level is met, then the ERP system will place a system-driven purchase order to the predetermined supplier. This will avoid the need for any human intervention for low-cost, high-moving spares, resulting in a reduction in service cost.

Automation Zone

This article is part of our monthly Automation Zone column. Read more from our monthly Automation Zone series.

Possible identification of triggers

In an operational plant, there are many triggers for maintenance. Among these are:

  1. Diagnostic triggers: Operating plants can attain a high level of reliability and efficiency based on proactive or predictive maintenance. Smart instruments such as transmitters and primary sensors these days are capable of monitoring themselves and can communicate to the plant control system about their health. They can communicate, for example:

    a. Sensor failure of a dual-element temperature transmitter
    b. Choking of an impulse line of a pressure/flow transmitter
    c. Changes in valve travel time
    d. Abnormal current consumption
  2. Scheduled preventive maintenance (PM) triggers: All of the instruments have scheduled PMs; these notifications are generated within the ERP system. The PM work in executed per standard maintenance practice (SMPs), with the SMP identifying what parts need to be replaced – for example, O-rings or gaskets.
  3. Device failure history that gets logged in the ERP system – data specific to a tag can also be used to predict an upcoming failure.

An automated ordering process virtually eliminates the need for human intervention, which reduces chances of human error. Over a plant’s lifecycle, it also can lower indirect and direct costs involved in procurement. The availability of failure and maintenance history data at one’s fingertips for analysis can facilitate predictive maintenance, and predictive consumption of spares leads to optimum inventory and storage levels.

Sponsored Recommendations

Arc Flash Prevention: What You Need to Know

March 28, 2024
Download to learn: how an arc flash forms and common causes, safety recommendations to help prevent arc flash exposure (including the use of lockout tagout and energy isolating...

Reduce engineering time by 50%

March 28, 2024
Learn how smart value chain applications are made possible by moving from manually-intensive CAD-based drafting packages to modern CAE software.

Filter Monitoring with Rittal's Blue e Air Conditioner

March 28, 2024
Steve Sullivan, Training Supervisor for Rittal North America, provides an overview of the filter monitoring capabilities of the Blue e line of industrial air conditioners.

Limitations of MERV Ratings for Dust Collector Filters

Feb. 23, 2024
It can be complicated and confusing to select the safest and most efficient dust collector filters for your facility. For the HVAC industry, MERV ratings are king. But MERV ratings...