Key ingredients for effective machine safety audits

Here are the key ingredients for an effective machine safety audit

By Steve Dukich and Mike Duta

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

Getting a complete picture from an optical illusion requires careful study and thoughtful examination — not a quick glance or cursory once-over. A machine safety audit requires this same depth and intensity of focus. If you don’t take time to analyze and study the entire picture, you’re likely to miss important details.

Auditing is the comparison of an existing condition to a desired condition. Health and safety standards set the minimum requirements for the desired condition. Numerous standards exist, but not all apply to every machine. This makes the auditing process challenging.

Machine safety auditors must, therefore, be familiar with the appropriate standards. But, which are appropriate? Certainly, the laws of each country set the basic requirements. In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has set out the basic requirements for machine safety. These standards are found in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Other countries have similar organizations and regulations. In addition to OSHA, many standards development organizations have developed consensus standards to help make industry a safer environment. For example, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) publishes NFPA 79, the electrical standard for industrial machinery. Machine auditors in the United States must use this standard. Another widely used standard in the United States is the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) ANSI Z535, which focuses on warning labels and signs. A few of the many standards that exist for specific machines are ANSI B11.1 for mechanical power presses, ANSI B155.1 for packaging machines and ANSI RIA R15.06 for robots. The challenge for a machine auditor is twofold: know which standards apply and understand what each standard requires.

A machine safety audit is a special type of audit. Its scope is limited to one machine rather than looking at a group of machines or a company’s safety program. One of the best ways to prepare for an audit is to have a checklist of questions. Many questions asked during a machine safety audit can be applied to many types of machines. Most, if not all, machines require electricity to operate; therefore, NFPA 79 (or its local equivalent) applies. For those machines built to specific standards, a machine-specific addendum should be attached to the checklist.

The depth of an audit is based on its objectives and the amount of information available. Typical safety system audits verify that the safety system is designed and installed to perform to some level of reliability and to meet functional performance requirements.

Governing bodies, consensus standards or the risk assessment that has been completed on the machine determine the level of safety system reliability needed. Consensus standards and the hazard control concepts selected from the results of the risk assessment are what define the functional performance requirements. A comprehensive audit evaluation of the safety system includes the evaluation of the safeguarding devices and the safety control logic.

The more common machine safety audit questions shown below aren’t intended to be a complete list for completing a satisfactorily. The audit process starts with gathering information. During the walk-through, the auditor needs a reference for comparison. Does the machine have a documented procedure that identifies the following:

  • Warning symbols and signs
  • Operating tasks
  • Procedure for clearing jams
  • Cleaning tasks
  • Maintenance tasks
  • Tasks requiring lockout/tagout
  • The lockout/tagout procedure

Does a risk assessment document:

  • Identify the modes of operation
  • A Task/Hazard Field Log
  • Selected safeguarding techniques for each hazard
  • Circuit performance requirement for each safeguard

If procedures exist, the auditor should become familiar with the steps and attempt to follow them during the machine walk-through. The documented risk assessment should identify the machine’s hazards as well as its safeguards and safety circuit architecture. The operating procedures for older machines might be missing or out of date, and risk assessments might not have been performed. In these cases, the operating procedures are communicated word-of-mouth from worker to worker. This leaves much room for improvising — and they’ll tend to streamline the process, but not necessarily follow the requirements for safer machine operation.

The plant engineer and operators might find an audit to be stressful. Putting them at ease is critical because openness and trust make audits more effective. The auditor should make proper introductions and briefly explain the auditing process.

The machine walk-through can begin after the participants don appropriate personal protective equipment. Using a series of open-ended questions, the auditor encourages the machine operator to explain how the tasks are performed in practice, not necessarily how they should be performed. During the walk-through, the auditor must observe the ways in which the operator is protected during the tasks and ask questions regarding what could go wrong during the machine cycle. Some of the questions the auditor must ask include:

  • Are the guards adequately secured to the floor or machine?
  • Can the operator reach around, over, under or through the safeguards?
  • Do the guards meet the appropriate spacing requirements?
  • When accessing the machine through a safeguard (e.g., a door or light curtain), can the operator reach the hazard before it is neutralized?
  • Are spare actuators available to bypass the interlocks? How are these controlled to prevent misuse?
  • Are warning signs present and prominently displayed?
  • Are controls, pushbuttons, switches and panels clearly marked?
  • Is the span of control of e-stop buttons obvious or labeled?

One of the more challenging aspects of a machine safety audit is understanding the intricacies of the control system. This is why a pre-audit risk assessment serves as a vital tool by helping identify potential hazards and defining specific safety functional requirements. To audit the control system effectively, the auditor must be able to look at the risk assessment and answer core questions, such as:

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments