Decision support systems digitize your mind

Executive Editor Russ Kratowicz shows you how to use a decision support system to take a load off your overworked mind.

By Russ Kratowicz, P.E., CMRP

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

I’d be willing to bet that if you scanned your environment right now and pondered the state of your company, you’d be able to provide several splendid examples of less-than-stellar decisions some of your contemporaries have managed to inflict on the entire organization. Sometimes the reasons for having done so are quite obvious, sometimes not. What is certain, though, is that as the number of input variables affecting the final decision increases much beyond two or three, the human brain loses its ability to justify calling ourselves homo sapiens. In the real world, the amount of data to be evaluated can be overwhelming. Perhaps the data are valid, but even so, it’s probably incomplete, messy and appears to differ little from a series of random numbers or facts. There must be a way to make sense of that hash in the industrial world.

It can be done. You’ve heard of the electronic trading systems used in the financial markets. Skilled traders systematically reduce their experience and intuition to a set of rules that a computer executes to return clear, unambiguous buy and sell signals much faster than a human can. Sometimes the computer itself initiates the trades. It’s the closest thing we’ve got to a money machine.

Join me for a leap into that digital morass we call the Web in search of practical, zero-cost, noncommercial, registration-free resources that ought to help you when you’re “the decider.” Remember, we search the Web so you don't have to.

An easy read

So, what exactly do we mean by the term decision support system (DSS)? You can bet it involves a computer. Beyond that, it would be better to pay a visit to academia and talk to the experts. In this case, I’d suggest you contact Marek J. Druzdzel and Roger R. Flynn from the Decision Systems Laboratory at the School of Information Sciences and Intelligent Systems Program at the University of Pittsburgh. I hesitate to refer to them as prototypical ivory-tower types because they’ve written a 15-page paper titled “Decision support systems” that avoids any use of the abstract, esoteric and abstruse, which should make it perfectly comprehensible to anyone reading this column. The paper explains the characteristics of decision problems and how computer programs can support decision making. It goes on to detail the various DSS components and the role they play in decision support. The authors introduce an emergent class of something called normative systems and decision-analytic DSS. Finally, they review issues related to DSS user interfaces and the importance they have to the quality of any computer-assisted decision. You might as well decide to wander over to and spend quality time with the document. It will be worth it.

Funding medicine

You no doubt have heard the old joke about the guy who goes to the optometrist for a new set of spectacles and, naturally, asks about price. The optometrist tells him it will be $75. When the stunned guy hesitates, the optometrist quickly adds, “per lens.” When the guy, now in shock, still doesn’t respond, the optometrist says, “plus frames.” Capitalism is all about negotiating for the best price you can get, and the researchers in the medical profession know how to exploit a DSS to maximize the returns for practitioners. If you think this is a joke, the next Web article citation is titled “Willingness-to-pay utility assessment: feasibility of use in normative patient decision support systems,” by Flowers, Garber, Bergen and Lenert, all from the Stanford University School of Medicine. The link ( takes you to an abstract of the article. That’s the best I could do. I found it impossible to finesse the digital morass to access the full text at any of the sites that mention the piece. The bottom line: You probably should be circumspect when talking to anyone in the medical field.

Another application

Come the fall, football season will be in full bloom, along with adjunct activities such as office pools and fantasy football leagues. Needless to say, if you’re going to put real cash into these ventures, you might want to consider the idea of using a DSS to slew the odds a bit more in your favor. One such single-purpose DSS is available, amazingly enough, on the Internet. Brandie Searle and Greg Alan developed the software and Automation Creations Inc., out of Blacksburg, Va., distributes it online. Although the software is free, you’ll need to subscribe if you want periodic data updates. I’d imagine that those who are sufficiently rabid about football will probably be able to wing it without the updates. That’s a personal choice you can make when you do an end run to to start betting smarter.

Organically grown

The financial markets in this country are said to be efficient. That means arbitrage, or buying a negotiable instrument at a low price in one market and selling at a high price in another, is nearly impossible, instant communication being what it is. Everything relevant that’s known about the stock or bond or whatever is already reflected in the price. Besides, there are thousands of people working on calculations and theories designed to beat the market. They’re all nibbling at the edges, never getting a big bite, and market prices reflect the truth about value. The collective action of so many players, a prediction market, constitutes a decision support system that indicates how much one should pay for a particular investment. But that’s not the only use for a prediction market. They’ve been applied to the Fed’s monetary policy, economic indicators, stock prices and more. They’re a sort of futures market that uses real money and has real payoffs; anyone can play, but it’s a winner-take-all game. If you’re interested in the power of prediction markets as a viable DSS, you should read “Prediction Markets as Decision Support Systems,” by Joyce E. Berg and Thomas A. Rietz at the Henry B. Tippie College of Business at the University of Iowa. This 15-page paper, available at, provides background for the prediction market they established for the 2008 presidential election. You can learn more about it at Political junkies can now put their money where their mouths are.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments