In the Trenches: Good samaritan out of an Acme job for "causing a ruckus"

An Acme worker, a former military man, leaves company property to aid a woman being mugged. His next pay check has a termination notice. What happened and how could it have been avoided?

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

When he landed a job at Acme, Shellie Lee thought his life was going to be much better. The job on the loading dock paid reasonably well, permitted him to spend part of his day outside the building, and didn’t require him to interact with many people. A big draw was that Acme fielded softball league team competing against the other businesses in this industrial neighborhood. Shellie was competitive, that’s for sure, and the teams took these outings seriously. The losers were obligated to pay for the keg of beer both sides enjoyed at the end of each game.

Shellie was former military, having recently served two miserable tours of duty simply because he couldn’t think of anything better to do with his life. After he was badly wounded, the military simply ejected him back into the states to make room for someone else.

He had hoped for a warmer hero’s welcome in the business world than he perceived he was getting. He had some skills and was trainable. After all, the military taught this inept lad to survive and dominate in hostile surroundings. For two full years, they had him trying to win the hearts and minds of skeptical noncombatants while being ready at a moment’s notice to inflict the measures, bare-handed, if necessary, the military taught him to perform with perfection and without a second thought. It was a perpetual adrenaline high that left him exhausted.

In those two fateful years, Shellie had seen a lifetime’s worth of violence and wanted no part of it any longer. He became, if not an outright pacifist, a recovering war machine living just this side of decidedly antisocial behavior. He felt that mankind had disappointed him.

Once out of uniform, he was struck by the pace at which globalization fomented change. Everything evolved much faster than he remembered. He was amazed at the business and societal changes that occurred while he was gone. Those who stayed here might not notice it, but the work world had evolved quite a bit in just a few years. His old rules, guidelines and expectations no longer applied.

Initially, civilian life was depressing. Shellie found it harder to find a job than he expected. The overseas experiences and the cultural disconnect he felt upon his return affected his behavior and attitudes. This might explain why he wound up as a loading dock laborer at Acme’s warehouse in a downtrodden part of town frequented by a rather unsavory cast of neighborhood characters. It reminded him of the neighborhoods in which he spent two years. So, like before, he just persevered and did his job.

And so it went, until one morning when Shellie heard a woman scream outside the building somewhere nearby. He ran to the dock door to investigate and saw a couple involved in an altercation across the street near the doorway to an abandoned building. Shellie realized this was a mugging in progress when he saw the man knock the woman down and start punching her to make her let go of her purse.

Shellie made a quick assessment of the situation and knew he could take the guy. As he started to run out the door, he wheeled around and grabbed a baseball bat from the locker. Shellie ran across the street, yelling at the assailant and making threatening gestures with the bat. Before he made it to the far curb, the mugger was already half-way down the block and not looking back.

Shellie picked up the purse and handed it to the hysterical woman. He calmed her down and brought her back into the Acme building, settled her in and called the police. By the time the squad car arrived, the dock area was full of curious Acme workers who were attracted by the commotion. After explanations all around and Shellie volunteering to be a witness if the perp is ever caught and brought to trial, the police drove the woman home and things at Acme settled into the usual routine.

When he picked up his pay envelope on Friday, Shellie noticed that it was thicker than usual. When he opened it, he found a termination notice stapled to the check. He marched to the plant office to search for his boss, Cliff Doueller, to demand an explanation.

Cliff told Shellie that, yes, he’s been fired for causing the ruckus when that woman got mugged. Shellie argued that he only did the right thing. Everyone, he said, has a right and an obligation to come to the aid of someone at risk of bodily harm.

Cliff didn’t see it that way. All he knew was that Shellie took the bat, company property, and walked off company property while he was supposed to be on duty. Then, Cliff added, Shellie used that Acme property to involve himself in a fight that was neither the company’s business nor his business. That action put Acme at risk of a liability claim. Just before he turned and walked away, Cliff ended the conversation by saying, "We can fire you any time we want, and we just did."

How could this situation have been avoided? Should companies have a policy that forbids workers to leave the property in the middle of a shift? If so, should they enforce it under this type of circumstances? Is abandoning one’s post sufficient reason to be terminated? If the law won’t help, what other recourse might Shellie try? Did the company really have just cause for firing Shellie since no one was hurt, the bat wasn’t used and there is no proof of any harm?

An attorney says:

As a society, we should be grateful that most corporations aren’t as mean spirited and narrow-minded as Acme was in this case. Acme should have given Shellie the hero’s award at the annual Christmas party, not a pink slip. We’ve all read the dismal press reports of people being mugged or even killed while bystanders looked on but refused to get involved. Would Acme management have enjoyed reading press reports that one of its employees stood on the loading dock, watched the woman being victimized, and did nothing?

Cliff was correct that Acme could fire Shellie any time it wanted, presuming he was an employee at will. There is one legal argument that could be raised in Shellie’s favor. While the law allows an employer to terminate an at-will employee at any time and for any reason, it doesn’t permit the discharge of an employee for engaging in an act that the law allows the employee to perform, such as filing a workers’ compensation claim or serving on a jury. The argument Shellie could use to challenge his discharge is that the law supports good Samaritans, and terminating an employee for being a good Samaritan violates public policy. I don’t recall seeing a case in which a similar argument was raised, but it certainly would be worth a try.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments