Acid-resistant concrete

A new technology to save you time and money.

By Anthony Oswald, Jr.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

Every year, plants spend millions of dollars repairing or replacing failed concrete. The corrosive environment in many plants subjects concrete to attack from a wide range of acids and alkalis. In addition, fuel oils and chlorinated hydrocarbon based products, while not always corrosive, must be contained and prevented from passing through the concrete and entering into soil or ground water. Repair, replacement and high-remediation costs for a failed system can be astronomical.

Standard Portland cement concrete has very little resistance to acids and salts. Acids readily attack the calcium-based binder in portland cement. This leaves behind nothing more than weakly-bound aggregates.

Because standard concrete is porous, non-corrosive chemicals pass through it easily contaminating the concrete itself and the ground below. Once this happens, replacement costs soar, since the concrete must be removed.

The cost to dispose of contaminated concrete and the contaminated soil around it continues to rise. Even when contaminated concrete can be repaired, the required, extensive surface preparation also is costly and owners incur disposal costs for a certain amount of debris.

A wide variety of coating and linings systems are available to protect concrete. The alternatives include thin-film coatings, filled and reinforced monolithics, membranes, acid brick, polymer concretes and sheet or molded liners made of rubber or plastics.

Generally, most of the coating and lining systems are epoxy, vinyl ester, polyester urethane, furan or silicate-based. The liners, for the most part, are natural or synthetic rubbers, polyvinylchloride, plastic or FRPs based on a variety of resins.

The cost for these systems varies tremendously depending upon surface preparation, plant conditions and available downtime. Even on new work, the cost ranges from only a few dollars per square foot to $30 or more per square foot. Repair work may be even higher.

Now, a breakthrough in concrete technology for precast structures eliminates many of these problems. Scientists at Drexel University developed a high performance, acid and corrosion resistant concrete that is completely free of portland cement.

The corrosive environment in many plants subjects concrete to attack from a wide range of acids and alkalis.

The chemistry of this material is unique since it contains no portland cement. The process combines a silicate solution and a chemical activator with Class F fly ash, sand and lime-free aggregate. The result is a high-performance concrete having a dense, impermeable microstructure with excellent resistance to most corrosive solutions.

The chemical reaction that takes place during the formation of this material is a polymerization reaction that creates a stone — like matrix with the strength and durability of naturally occurring elements.

The interaction of the sand and stone particles with the binder paste — fly ash, silicate and the alkaline activator — cause the dense structure. The result is a material structure that is mechanically and chemically resistant to aggressive environments. Portland cement concrete has a greater degree of porosity and a binder system that does not resist chemical attack.

New path to old technology

The basic silicate chemistry of this system is not new. Silicate-based cements, mortars, refractories and concretes have a long history of use in aggressive environments.

Power plant chimneys, scrubbers, acid containment vessels and high-temperature refractory applications in refineries and power plants are only a few of the applications that use silicate-based products.

The chemical and temperature resistance of silicates is far superior, not only to portland cement, but to epoxies, vinyl esters, polyesters, urethanes and furans. It is also superior to other calcium-based products such as calcium aluminate cements. The main drawback to their use has always been the cost, which ranges up to $1,000 per ton.

This new technology provides the advantages of silicate chemistry without the high cost. The patented process allows existing manufacturing plants — precasters — to produce high-performance, cementitious structures comparable in price to Portland cement structures with reasonably good lining systems.

However, with this new technology, instead of a thin, corrosion resistant barrier protecting concrete that is easily susceptible to damage, the entire mass of the structure is corrosion resistant. Concerns about seams that can break open or disbondment are no longer issues. Further, mechanical damage that destroys the integrity of a lining system is also of very little concern. A chip or gouge in this concrete only exposes more concrete with the same physical and chemical properties as the surface.

Structures produced with this advanced concrete material are manufactured under controlled conditions. Experienced production management teams assist precast plants, using conventional mixing, placing and forming equipment. Production management works with the precaster for optimum use of existing plant assets and modification where necessary. This ensures rigid quality control — something that is not always possible with structures that require additional measures for corrosion protection.

Installations

When installing protective lining systems, many variables determine the quality and effectiveness of any given system. Some of these critical factors are surface preparation, temperature — both ambient and substrate — moisture, seam or joint irregularities, pinholes, thickness variations and curing of both the concrete and the lining system. If difficulties occur in any of these areas, the lining system can be rendered useless and the concrete comes under attack.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments