Conventionally reinforced precast concrete column and beam frame structure

Sept. 13, 2006

PROJECT PROFILE

Structure: Conventionally reinforced precast concrete column and beam frame structure with cast-in-place grouted connections supporting horizontal fan radiators (fin fans) supported by cast-in-place spread footings

Location: U.S. Gulf Coast

Age: 25 years

Materials of Construction: Standard 60-ksi reinforcing steel bars with 4,500-psi concrete

Process Environment: The manufacturing process involves banks of very large fans (greater than 10 inches in diameter) and coil tubing assemblies rigidly fixed to concrete beams. The purpose of the equipment is to cool process fluids associated with the production of hydrocarbon-based resin plastics. Essentially, the equipment functions as a super-sized, horizontally mounted, “car radiator.” Process temperatures in contact with the open-frame structure are ambient; however, significant vibration is associated with equipment operation.

Loading Conditions: The banks of fin fans are made of lightweight structural materials (i.e., structural aluminum frames, thin walled alloy-steel tubing and carbon-fiber composite fan blades). Fan motors represent the highest loads but are a small portion of the structural assembly.

Owner’s Concern: Cracking, delamination and open spalls with exposed corroding reinforcing steel bars and numerous failed repair programs elevated concern about the functionality of this critical piece of equipment in the process stream. Additionally, falling concrete pieces from elevated regions of the structure created near-miss events for personnel who operated the unit.

Repair Approach: Reviewing many of the repair attempts and subsequent failures, it was clear that the root-cause deterioration mechanisms were not clearly understood. By touch, vibrations were noticeable and thought to be a significant contributor to the observed distress. The owner was eager to review the problem from another perspective, so a team was assembled to design-build an approach that could be implemented without placing the high revenue-generating unit into a T/A scenario.

Specialized expertise was contracted to assess the structural vibration phenomenon as well as conduct a forensic evaluation of the existing condition of the concrete frame and failure mechanisms associated with prior repair programs. One item noted, was the manufacturer’s recommendation that the fin fan blades be balanced at regular maintenance intervals.

Attaching recording accelerometers at strategic locations throughout the fin fan structures revealed the fans were unbalanced and imparting a vibration response to the structure. This response was close to the natural harmonic signature of the concrete support frame – causing the structures to experience a shudder when the fin fans ran up (start up) or ran down, (shutdown). Reviewing maintenance records for the unit revealed the fan blades had never been balanced in their 25-year history. It was calculated, based on an analysis of the structural design and reported fin fan operation records, that the structures were experiencing fatigue from the daily operational shudder.

The QA/QC during original fabrication ensured the production of a good quality precast concrete frame. In addition, forensic evidence revealed the mechanical and chemical properties of the precast concrete frame were of good quality. Cracking, delamination and open spalls with corroding reinforcing steel bars were determined to be secondary effects associated with the primary deterioration mechanism of structural vibration and fatigue. Vibration also created fatal flaws in prior repair programs attempted on-line as the repair products didn’t have an opportunity to develop bond with parent concrete substrates.

After much discussion, the repair team determined three scenarios that could reduce or mitigate vibration in the fin fan structures. These scenarios included:

  • balancing the fin fan blades at recommended manufacturer intervals;
  • adding mass to the structures to dampen mechanical vibration effects; or
  • strengthening the structure by stiffening its members to resist mechanical vibration effects.

View related content on PlantServics.com

After analyzing the various scenarios, the owner indicated balancing of fin fan blades would not be performed at recommended intervals, since outages were very rare in the unit and only after extreme conditions warranted the downtime (e.g., fire, explosion, chemical spill, etc.). Adding mass wasn’t feasible due to the tight footprint of the structures within the unit, leaving strengthening as the opportunity of choice.

Repair Strategy: The root-cause analysis developed a path forward that integrated an initial design phase in the repair program. A comprehensive shoring program had to be designed as an independent support system to remove the fin fan mechanical components off the concrete frame structure, thereby removing equipment dead loads and vibrations from concrete repair substrates. Next, the structure would need to incorporate repair-in-kind concrete repairs for the deteriorated concrete members. Once these members had been brought back to original cross-section and integrity, selected members would be stiffened by employing span-shortening bracing and wrapping the precast concrete members and cast-in-place grouted connections with fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP).

Repair Program: Preplanning is always important when working around operating units; however, the high-pressure equipment and fragile equipment components/alarm sensors required close coordination with operating personnel, especially during equipment shoring system installation. The shoring system employed a commercially available modular shoring system, modified to incorporate hydraulic-actuated lifting rams operating in-series to provide a smooth and consistent lift. (The actual lift distance was only the thickness of a credit card.) The lifting rams nestled into a locking chair, and once the load was transferred to the new temporary shoring structure, the load could be mechanically locked off for safety. Repair-in-kind repairs efforts were initiated once all fin fan equipment was shored.

The repair operated under hot-work permit conditions using standard small 15-pound class jackhammer demolition techniques followed by high-pressure (greater than 10,000 psi) water-blasting of prepared concrete substrates. Prebagged, cementitious repair concrete products, matching existing concrete substrate properties, were installed into cavity formwork via form-and-pump and form-and-pour techniques. Small and shallow depth (less than one-inch deep) locations employed trowel-applied techniques, using prebagged repair mortars to reestablish depth of protective cover overtop embedded reinforcing steel bars. Once repaired, a series of structural-steel K braces were installed at various locations based on the vibration simulation model and then encapsulated in concrete in accordance with plant fireproofing requirements. All grouted connections were then wrapped in multiple layers of glass-fiber-based FRP. After each structure was completed, the temporary shoring support was removed, and the load was successfully transferred back to the newly repaired and modified concrete frame structure.

Lessons Learned: The project was successful because the owner was tired of throwing money at shortsighted repairs and was resolute about finding the root cause of the observed deterioration. Additionally, temporarily transferring fin fan loads to a shoring support structure created an opportunity to provide an active repair (i.e., full-section load bearing composite repair) allowing the optimum opportunity for success. Prior repair attempts had also been performed on-line; however, the repair entities and repair-material manufacturer representatives had not considered vibration a significant issue, even after multiple failures with resinous as well as cementitious products. This project illustrates that close attention to detail in each phase of a repair pays off with a durable repair/strengthening work product installed in an aggressive operating environment.

Sponsored Recommendations

Arc Flash Prevention: What You Need to Know

March 28, 2024
Download to learn: how an arc flash forms and common causes, safety recommendations to help prevent arc flash exposure (including the use of lockout tagout and energy isolating...

Reduce engineering time by 50%

March 28, 2024
Learn how smart value chain applications are made possible by moving from manually-intensive CAD-based drafting packages to modern CAE software.

Filter Monitoring with Rittal's Blue e Air Conditioner

March 28, 2024
Steve Sullivan, Training Supervisor for Rittal North America, provides an overview of the filter monitoring capabilities of the Blue e line of industrial air conditioners.

Limitations of MERV Ratings for Dust Collector Filters

Feb. 23, 2024
It can be complicated and confusing to select the safest and most efficient dust collector filters for your facility. For the HVAC industry, MERV ratings are king. But MERV ratings...