The Acme defense plant in Howe's Bayou, La. is doing quite well these days. Pentagon contracts for countless gallons of the company's high-purity trimethyl flubdub provide for a rather healthy accounts receivable total each month.
Andy Enroon has been working at Acme for his entire career. He dropped out of school in the late 1950s to sweep Acme's floors. He acknowledged his limitations and kept his ego in check. Andy kept his nose to the grindstone and his ear to the ground. The intervening years saw him work his way up the food chain to land his current position as assistant plant manager.
One reason that Acme's cash flow is so good is the Six Sigma quality improvement program the company introduced, nurtured and supported during the past four years. The outside gurus and trainers weren't just blowing smoke.
Andy was perfectly situated to be a key player in the Six Sigma game. He had the data that turned into the key performance indicators the program required. He knows everyone and everyone knows Andy. In fact, Andy was the first employee to become a certified Six Sigma Black Belt. That role had him meeting with, coaching and counseling every employee, individually and in groups.
Once Acme set the quality groundwork, the fiscal tide turned, and purchase orders began arriving in bushel basket quantities. Acme had to begin hiring strangers from outside the immediate environs. Most appreciated being self-directed and having their work evaluated on the basis of objective Six Sigma performance measures instead of being reviewed by a cranky boss that didn't really "get it." On the other hand, there were a few that struggled with the performance expectations of their peers.
Among the newer employees, Hazel Knutt is an affable young lady, but certainly not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Although Andy knew the high-level statistics that characterize a Six Sigma program are well beyond her grasp, he was aghast to discover that even after training, Hazel struggled with tasks as simple as completing a check list without error.
Another recent hire and Hazel's good buddy out on the plant floor is Roxanne Roules, a stereotypical party animal. A real looker, Roxy usually arrives late on Monday morning. In spite of the performance metrics highlighting her less-than-stellar output, she views her job as a never-ending company sanctioned gabfest and social mixer.
Several times, John Darme, the militarily crisp and demanding supervisor heading the department where Hazel and Roxy "work," cautioned both women that they had best clean up their acts and get with the program. With his own workload being higher than normal, John woke up one morning and realized that both ladies have been on the payroll for nearly four months, putting them safely beyond the company's published three-month probationary period.
One perfectly good sunny Tuesday in late spring, Andy was called into the plant manager's office and handed an official looking envelope full of court papers that alleged Andy Enroon was guilty of sexual harassment with respect to Hazel Knutt and Roxanne Roules.
Andy was floored and denied the allegations categorically for the next few hours as a parade of executives trooped through. By the time Andy walked back to his office in a daze just before lunch, he found three of the people that work with Hazel and Roxy complaining about having to pick up the extra load. That's when Andy decided it was time to sever Acme's relationship with Hazel and Roxy. This was something he wanted to do personally, not through John Darme or anyone in HR.
Both women became rather vocal in the next few minutes, yelling in a threatening manner that it was unfair, illegal and going to be big trouble for Acme. Before it turned ugly, the plant's security officer escorted Hazel and Roxy out the front door. Their parting shots included nasty comments about a lawsuit for retaliatory discharge.
When John gathered his crew together to explain that both women had been terminated, some of the workers informed him that on several occasions they had heard Hazel and Roxy discussing ways to get rid of the boss.
Later that afternoon, John and the security officer inspected the two recently vacated lockers. That's when they discovered several manuals on sexual harassment and a booklet that described the proper words to use when making a complaint to management.
How could this situation have been avoided? Is Acme in trouble?
A corporate consultant's response:
Andy's deliberately excluding HR from the termination process, once he knew a complaint had been filed was wholly indefensible. Despite the fact they filed the complaint before his action, Andy, more than any casual factor discussed below, put Acme at risk. There were at least four other opportunities to have avoided this problem.
Despite being a Six Sigma environment, it sounds as if Acme doesn't have metrics in place to monitor job performance. This would have forced Darme to document worker's performance and provide evidence-based measures to justify future disciplinary actions.
Upon discerning Knutt's incompetence, Andy should have notified Darme, documenting his concern about her ability and suggesting appropriate responses.
Third, it's clear that Darme should have acted earlier. He had adequate cause to take action even without Andy's information. Having failed to do so, however, does not negate the fact that Darme could have placed both Knutt and Roxy back on probation. In this respect, Darme failed to perform his managerial function.
Finally, some responsibility for this problem must be borne by Acme's HR department, as it seems that the hiring process didn't include adequate assessments of the candidate's ability to perform the job.
Dalton Alliances, Inc.