1661880182930 Askjeff170627

Mitigating risk – No scheduled maintenance as a strategy

June 26, 2017
One of our responsibilities in maintenance is to manage risk.

Question: Hi, Jeff. In your post, “Just because we can doesn't mean we should: Answering the 'Is it worth doing?' question,” at the end you say, “I’ll go on to add that no scheduled maintenance does not mean run to failure (RTF).” What does “no scheduled maintenance” mean? What's the process for the maintenance items that fall into this category? How are they accomplished?

Jack, maintenance supervisor, Illinois

Answer: Jack, thank you for the follow-up question. 

One of our responsibilities in maintenance is to manage risk. John Moubray, in his "Reliability Centered Maintenance Second Edition" book, notes that no scheduled maintenance is valid only if:

  • "A suitable scheduled task cannot be found for a hidden function, and the associated multiple failure does not have safety or environmental consequences.
  • A cost-effective preventative task cannot be found for failures which have operational or non-operational consequences.’

According to engineering association SAE's JA1012 reliability-centered maintenance standard, "For failure modes that could not affect safety or the environment, failure management policies are considered in the following order: on-condition tasks, scheduled restoration/discard tasks, no scheduled maintenance, and one-time changes."     

Unlike what most consider run-to-failure (RTF) for a component, we don’t forget about the item. While we may choose to not run vibration analysis on the pump bearings because of system redundancy, we would still perform basic care tasks such as lubrication and cleaning.

No scheduled maintenance does not mean no planned maintenance. We can plan for the failure by having a consequence-reduction strategy or reducing the time to repair. For example, if we choose to let the part fail, then should we stock the part to replace it to reduce the time required to restore the item to service? To facilitate the restoration, we may choose to develop a corrective job plan that outlines lockout/tagout procedures, precision procedures, and materials required.

In complex systems, when there is evidence that the proactive task does nothing to predict or prevent the failure, performing the task itself may introduce failure to an otherwise stable system. Poor workmanship and human error are examples of this effect. Consider a photo-eye sensor with operational or nonoperational consequences. Are you replacing it every year or two? Most likely, no. What proactive tasks would you choose beyond ensuring that it functions as expected and cleaning the lens/reflector when needed?

Operational or nonoperational consequences mean the failure has an economic impact only. It costs us money regarding repair, customer service, secondary damage, and downtime as examples. We consider on-condition tasks and scheduled restoration/discard tasks to be proactive tasks. If we cannot find a proactive task that meets both the technically feasible and "worth doing" questions, then no scheduled maintenance is the next choice on in the RCM2 decision logic tree.  In the case where the repair costs are too high, then the secondary default decision is redesign.

What are your thoughts? Please leave your comments below.

Talk soon,
Jeff

If you have questions in the fields of maintenance, reliability, planning and scheduling, MRO storerooms, or leadership as examples, please contact Jeff Shiver with your question(s) here.

About the Author

Jeff Shiver | Founder and managing principal at People and Processes, Inc.

Jeff Shiver CMRP is a founder and managing principal at People and Processes, Inc. Jeff guides people to achieve success in maintenance and reliability practices using common sense approaches. Visit www.PeopleandProcesses.com or email [email protected].

Sponsored Recommendations

A Paradigm Shift in Pump Selection

Jan. 22, 2025
Discover how INNOMAG® is transforming pump selection with innovative design and unparalleled performance. Learn how this breakthrough solution simplifies operations, enhances ...

The Need for Speed: The Most Advanced Sealless Pump is Also the Fastest

Jan. 14, 2025
Struggling with a troublesome pump? Get a reliable solution in just five days with the fastest, most advanced sealless pump on the market.

Say Goodbye to Pumping’s Weakest Links

Jan. 14, 2025
Shaft seals and ball bearings cause nearly 80% of pump failures—but not with INNOMAG®. With no seals, no bearings, and a thrust-balanced design, these pumps deliver unmatched ...

Ready to Reduce the Cost of Energy with a Highly Efficient, More Forgiving Pump?

Jan. 14, 2025
INNOMAG® pumps save energy and maintain peak efficiency over time—no wear and tear. Discover how they can lower your operating costs and increase reliability.