Bill Holmes on Energy
When the cost of the labor associated with using data loggers to collect spot data is considered, the practice is too expensive to be practical. Funding their use is just another example of paying engineers for preparing to save energy rather than paying them for actually saving energy.
“Do You Realize What You Have? You Have a Money Machine. You are Paying Owners to Let You Work in Their Building.”
By using no-cost, low-cost methods to tune-up energy systems and reduce utility costs without capital projects, an owner can pay energy professionals for their services with part of the dollars saved and put the rest of the savings in their pocket.
There were about 3.7 million deaths from outdoor air pollution in 2012. Coal particulates pollution alone is estimated to shorten approximately 1,000,000 lives annually worldwide, including nearly 24,000 lives a year in the United States. Reducing the energy wasted in buildings will literally save and improve the quality of millions of lives.
The energy systems were the responsibility of the custodians; the same people who swept the floors at night. The poorly trained operator was wasting more of the owner’s money every year than it would have cost to hire one with the required education, skills and experience.
We didn't do Energy Audits of any of the buildings.The first step was to install a permanent energy monitoring system which provided much more comprehensive and accurate data than the estimated data from an Energy Audit. We focused on producing actual savings as quickly as possible.
After my wife and I were married her Energy Efficiency Rating started to drop. For a while we were about average and then we sunk to below average. We’re too embarrassed to even go outside anymore. I’m not sure our marriage will survive. Help me Watson. What can we do?
Some of Watson's best comics and most profound comments from the past several weeks.
Watson: Unless the people at the top put reducing energy costs high on the priority list and provide the employees with the incentive and information they need to understand and manage when, where and how the utility dollars are being spent, it isn’t going to get done.
Watson: Using the analogy of picking fruit, I can’t see how lighting projects could possibly be considered “Low Hanging Fruit”. They are expensive, require a significant investment and have long paybacks. Walking through a field picking low hanging fruit only requires a sack over one or two of your four shoulders.
Watson: If a company thinks they can manage their energy costs without actual data, I wonder if their corporate slogan is, “Better Management through Ignorance” or “Our Management Decisions are the Same With or Without Facts”?