Reducing energy cost through improved disturbance rejection

Download Now

Overview:

Two of the most popular architectures for improving regulatory performance and increasing profitability are cascade control and feed forward with feedback trim. Both architectures trade off additional complexity in the form of instrumentation and engineering time for a controller better able to reject the impact of disturbances on the measured process variable. These architectures neither benefit nor detract from set point tracking performance. This paper compares and contrasts the two architectures and links the benefits of improved disturbance rejection with reducing energy costs in addition to improved product quality and reduced equipment wear. A comparative example is presented using data from a jacketed reactor process.

There's More to This Story

Get more. You can read the rest of this story and other exclusive content as a Plant Services member. It's FREE, and it’s easy. We just need your name and email address. Then you can read everything you want on our site and even comment on it.

Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments