Take stock of your spares program

Better management of spare parts inventories can unlock a hidden source of profit.

By Liang Dong, SKF

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

Machines need spare parts. Any business operating significant quantities of machinery will carry of a stock of replacement components. Those parts fulfill a variety of purposes. They are there to replace items such as bearings, seals, and filters that wear out during normal operations, and they need to be ready for planned upgrades and overhaul activities. They act as insurance, allowing maintenance teams to fix breakdowns faster than the lead times required to secure replacements from an external supplier.

Ensuring that the organization has the right number of the right spare parts in its inventory can be a continual source of tension, however. Maintenance and operations teams want to maximize availability to reduce the risk of unplanned downtime and lost production that results from missing parts. Finance staff members want to minimize the amount of valuable capital tied up on the shelves, and they worry about obsolescence costs associated with parts bought for equipment that’s no longer in use.

Both sides are right. Research by SKF has shown that optimizing spare-parts management can reduce inventory budgets and holding costs by 15% to 20%, while simultaneously cutting stockouts (and resulting lost production) by 30% to 50%.

But how does a company achieve those optimal inventories? The trick lies in a better understanding of the organization’s assets, of the spare parts they require, and of the nature of demand for those parts.

Some parts are all the same

Most organizations maintain a register of their assets together with a database of the spare parts required to support those assets. Often, these parts databases have been developed organically over time, leading to inconsistency and duplication. For example, parts for two versions of the same asset may be listed in different ways on the database, and simple standard parts like belts or switches may appear on the database under different names. This duplication matters because it reduces inventory efficiency. A company may order additional versions of the same part because the database doesn’t show that they already have an appropriate item in their inventory.

Eliminating this waste requires database standardization. The best companies use a common architecture for assets in their database and standard maintenance bill-of-materials (BOM) structures and catalogue descriptions for the spare parts associated with those assets. It’s common for companies to be able to reduce the number of items in their spare-parts inventories by 10% to 15% just by eliminating duplicate or obsolete items.

Understanding demand

Once the current required parts are known, a company needs to decide how many of each part it should keep in inventory. Getting that right calls for an understanding of the way demand patterns vary, according to the nature of the part, and of the criticality of the asset to which it belongs.

Demand for spare parts falls into three basic categories: consumable spares, operational spares and insurance spares, and the best forecasting strategies for each are very different.

Consumable spares are items such as filters and lubricants. Typically, they are lower-cost objects used in quite large numbers. When companies look at their historical consumption of spares such as these, they will see a record of relatively level demand over time. Setting the optimal inventory level for these parts is a matter of establishing the quantity required to meet the overall average level of demand, plus an appropriate safety stock. That figure can then be refined to account for seasonal variations in demand as production patterns change and updated over the longer term as the company adjusts its asset base.

Operational spares are items like fans and motors for which demand is intermittent and unpredictable. Setting the right inventory level for these parts requires a more-sophisticated statistical approach. By analyzing historical use, companies can gain an understanding both of their average consumption of these parts and consumption variability. They can also build a picture of the mean, minimum, and maximum lifetimes for parts in service.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments