The Electrical Apparatus Service Association (EASA) has published two documents to help users and service providers ensure that motor repairs performed reflect good practices that maintain or improve a machine's energy efficiency and reliability: ANSI/EASA Standard AR100-2015: Recommended Practice for the Repair of Rotating Electrical Apparatus and the "Good Practice Guide" of the 2003 study The Effect of Repair/Rewinding on Motor Efficiency, by EASA and the Association of Electrical and Mechanical Trades (AEMT). These documents serve as tools by which service centers and end users can speak the same language when it comes to level-setting service and performance expectations on motor repair and rewind.
Also, a little more than a year ago, EASA launched its electric motor repair accreditation program, based on AR100 and the "Good Practice Guide." The program benefits both end-users and service providers by ensuring that electric motor repairs conform to the good practices identified in the aforementioned documents. "
Electric motor efficiency can be maintained during repair and rewind by following defined good practices. This article builds on my previous discussion of PM and PdM for three-phase squirrel-cage motors ("PM and PdM for electric motors") by outlining some of the expectations and good practices for repairs of these types of motors.
Initial inspection and testing
The repair process should begin with rigorous testing and inspection as specified in ANSI/EASA AR100-2015. Besides providing an accurate assessment of the machine's condition and repairs needed, this good practice often identifies latent faults or weaknesses that can be addressed during the repair process to improve the machine's reliability.
Careful inspection of the lubricant reservoir, for example, might indicate water intrusion of which the end user was not aware. Rather than simply removing the contaminant and adding fresh lubricant, the service center might recommend retrofitting the motor with a sealing arrangement (i.e., a new feature that would improve reliability).
A good practice rewind typically duplicates the original winding's magnetic parameters and losses to ensure that the motor retains its original energy efficiency. Sometimes, however, the service center can make winding changes that will increase efficiency and possibly reliability, too.
Winding copper losses are the product of current (I) squared times resistance (R), expressed as I2R. Because the EASA-accredited rewind process strives to maintain the motor's original design, the current should not change. But there are some good practices that can reduce the winding's resistance. The most common are increasing the wire area of the winding turns, reducing the average length of an end turn (see Table 1), or doing both.
The resulting lower value of R in the I2R formula will reduce power losses and therefore increase efficiency. Lower losses will also reduce heating, thus extending the thermal life of the winding's insulation system and improving the motor's reliability.
For example, increasing the winding wire area of a motor with low slot fill will reduce resistive losses and therefore decrease heating (see Figure 1). A cooler winding also will have less electrical resistance than a hot winding, so it will be more efficient. As an added benefit, a tighter slot fit will improve heat transfer from the winding through the insulating varnish to the core and cooling air. It also will permit less wire movement, thus increasing the fatigue life and therefore the mechanical life of the winding. The combined effect will be a more reliable and energy-efficient motor winding.