Ultrasound assisted lubrication

Adding ultrasound monitoring to standard lubrication best practices can lead to fewer bearing failures, extend motor and bearing life, and decrease the amount of lubricant used.

By Alan Bandes, Vice President, Marketing UE Systems, Inc.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

View more lubricant content on PlantServics.com

“As many as 60 to 80 percent of all bearing failures (catastrophic, functional and premature) are lubrication-related, whether it's poor lubricant selection, poor application, lubricant contamination or lubricant degradation.”
— Mark Barnes, NORIA Corporation

In today's manufacturing environment, cost control is important. In fact, it is essential to survival. Profit margins are shrinking; often the difference between profit and loss can be as simple as improving efficiencies. Locating sources of waste and identifying failure conditions can improve the bottom line.

The most influential cause of failure is lubrication related. This includes using the wrong lubricant along with improper lubrication practices such as not enough or too much lubricant. Using improper lubricant can damage a bearing to the point of irreversible failure, causing machine and production shutdown, lost hours and significant downtime. Bearings running with too little lubricant can cause friction requiring more energy to overcome the resistance, which can lead bearing failure and eventual seizure. Using too much lubricant can also produce heat, break seals and decrease acceptable tolerances, which will lead to bearing failure.

Proper lubrication of bearings is essential as it helps dampen stress distribution. As stated, lack of lubrication will create friction, while over lubrication creates grease build up, thickening the area around the bearing, making it difficult to rotate.

In order to eliminate the problems caused by over or under lubrication, as well as several other inspection requirements throughout the plant, many companies around the world have incorporated some form of a condition monitoring program. As opposed to the other forms of maintenance such as reactive, in which a failure condition has occurred and maintenance personnel must "react" to the problem, or preventive, where maintenance activities are performed on a set schedule, condition monitoring is used to check the health or "condition" of operating equipment. Any change in monitored fields can alert maintenance personnel of potential failure and allow the repair to be performed on a scheduled, controlled basis.

The most influential cause of failure is lubrication related.

– Alan Bandes, Vice President, Marketing UE Systems, Inc.

Traditional lubrication condition monitoring programs include preventive procedures such as time-based lubrication, where lubrication is performed at set timed intervals with a specified amount of grease applied. However, the issue with time-based lubrication is that if the bearing being lubricated has a sufficient amount of grease already and does not need lubricant, the inspector is at high risk of over lubrication. Another issue with time-based lubrication is that some bearings may require lubricant to be applied more frequently than assumed through this procedure.

These types of issues do not preclude the need for standard preventive procedures such as removing old, used up grease and adding new grease. Among the most effective methods available to assist in lubrication inspection is the use of ultrasound technology.

Ultrasound technology

Airborne/structure borne ultrasound instruments receive high frequency emissions produced by operating equipment, electrical emissions and leaks. These frequencies typically range from 20 kHz to 100 kHz and are beyond the range of human hearing. The instruments electronically translate ultrasound frequencies through a process called heterodyning down into the audible range where they are heard through headphones and observed as intensity and/or dB levels on a display panel.

Adding ultrasound monitoring to standard lubrication best practices can prevent potential over-lubrication of bearings, which can also lead to fewer bearing failures, extend motor and bearing life, and lead to a decrease in the amount of lubricant used.

And that affects your bottom line through:

  • Savings in maintenance costs, lubricant, man-hours
  • Improved asset availability and reliability

Lubrication: What is too much vs. too little?

While many bearings can fail due to lack of lubrication, over-lubrication is considered one of the major causes of bearing failure. Standard preventive time-based procedures may be useful if this practice is followed without any feedback regarding the condition of a bearing. However, it may lead to an over-lubricated condition that will eventually cause bearing failure. Many maintenance departments are therefore switching to a combination of preventive and condition-based lubrication.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments