Home > Articles > Energy Expert
Voices: Energy Expert
Politics vs. common sense
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says the U.S. Army's master planning goes beyond geographic or political constraints.
By Peter Garforth
Last week I spoke at a workshop organized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The theme of the workshop was the challenge of introducing long-term energy master planning for their bases to achieve breakthrough levels of energy efficiency, energy security and greenhouse gas reductions. The Army has recognized that long-term energy master planning spanning decades ahead is essential if their sites are to approach the elusive target of net-zero energy, combined with very high levels of supply security and low operating costs.
It’s interesting to look at the Army’s challenge a little deeper, as it’s similar to that faced by large industrial complexes and communities in general. The most obvious question is, why on earth is a military force concerned about energy efficiency to this degree. The most important answers are supply security and cost. The less energy a garrison uses, the easier it is to develop redundant supply strategies to ensure security. Closely associated with efficiency is the need to adopt strategies that reduce seasonal variations and energy peaks, thereby reducing distribution and generation investments.
With its geographic reach, the U.S. Army is familiar with energy practices around the world. A long presence in Europe has brought contact with the integrated energy systems of Germany and Scandinavia. The workshop regularly reminded that prioritizing using the Loading Order, or Trias Energetica (www.triasenergetica.com) as it is called in Europe, should drive any good Energy Master Plan. These priorities are to first, maximize efficiency; second, maximize heat recovery and cogeneration; third, maximize the viable use of renewables; and fourth, optimize investments between the site and the grid.
Compared to others, large sites that have applied the loading order rigorously over many years typically use at most half the energy, generate proportionally even less greenhouse gases and are lower cost, more reliable and more flexible. This has been known for decades. So, why do we see this implemented so rarely? In all too many cases, it’s because politics trumps common sense.
The U.S. Army, hardly a bastion of wooly liberalism, clearly recognizes the value of having energy common sense serve as the driver. It’s challenging suppliers to develop long-term integrated energy solutions using best practices from around the world. It was no accident that a number of the participants at the workshop were from various European countries, including the Netherlands, Scandinavia and Germany. The picture they painted of seamless integration between very high-efficiency buildings and other efficiencies, district energy, cogeneration, renewables and peak reductions on the utility grids is one the Army is already moving towards implementing in the United States and elsewhere.
Success means not only developing multi-decade energy master plans; it also means having the discipline to follow them. Developing the plans is still more of an art than a science, with a relatively small number of practitioners worldwide. The Corps of Engineers is developing tools and frameworks to make this a more systematic, repeatable process; an exercise that will have a value well beyond their own facilities. These will be the road maps that will set the criteria for all renovations, new construction, energy supply and other procurements long into the future.
Also revealing at this workshop was the range of technologies being discussed as components of highly efficient garrisons. Passive house construction techniques result in buildings ready to be hooked into energy systems that collectively will approach a net-zero energy footprint for the site as a whole. The multiple aspects of efficient collection, distribution and use of heat in all its various forms was highlighted with advanced district energy systems, solar thermal collectors, radiant heating cooling techniques, cogeneration and integration of absorption cooling into thermal systems. Tying everything together with sophisticated smart metering and flexible control technology is increasingly required.
Far from being seen as cost-prohibitive, there’s a growing recognition that at these levels of breakthrough energy performance, there can be tipping points. At these points, costs ratchet down in steps rather than incrementally increase. So, the bottom line is technical flexibility, cost reduction and enhanced supply security. Behind all this is a dramatic decrease in greenhouse gas emissions as a clear collateral benefit to manage future risks.
The U.S. Army is to be congratulated on embracing a commonsense approach to energy management. Probably the biggest single point is the recognition that secure, reliable, low-cost, clean and flexible energy solutions makes sense for its mission and has no political color. Army engineers also are to be congratulated in recognizing that these results can’t be achieved with individual projects, but will be the results of systematic, well planned, integrated solutions implemented over many years. These are lessons all energy managers should take to heart.
Peter Garforth is principal of Garforth International LLC, Toledo, Ohio. He can be reached at peter@garforthint.com.
More Voices
Politics vs. common sense
02/01/2010
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says the U.S. Army's master planning goes beyond geographic or political constraints.
What happened at Copenhagen?
01/04/2010
According to Energy Expert Peter Garforth, more than you might have been led to believe.
Define efficiency
11/30/2009
According to Energy Expert Peter Garforth, how you measure can significantly affect your success.
Climate risk management
11/02/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth asks is it such a big deal?
Endangered species?
10/12/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says that political and economic pressures distract us from risks.
Renewable energy made easy
08/31/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth explains how to bring green into the real world.
The problem with renewable energy
08/03/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth explains why it's so difficult to justify for industrial applications.
Fields of green
06/30/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth wonders if sustainable energy can revitalize U.S. manufacturing.
Fighting words
06/04/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth explores energy productivity from a military perspective.
The heat value chain is broken
04/28/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth delves into how cogeneration can double our energy efficiency.
Green diesel: Oxymoron or real promise?
04/07/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth explains why biodiesel and ethanol don't belong in the same breath.
The reality of green jobs
03/10/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth reports that the shortage of energy expertise is strategic, as well as tactical.
Energy proposal
02/10/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth puts forth his vision for an energy efficient and economically secure world in this hypothetical piece. Is this a speech you would like to make into reality?
Assault on strategy
01/13/2009
Energy Expert Peter Garforth emphasizes the power of benchmarking in times of crisis.
Energy evangelists and converts
12/02/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth asks, "Are we finally getting it?"
Energy versus economics
11/11/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says hard times and lower oil prices poise to test our resolve.
Where is our leaders’ courage?
10/07/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says the fate of our industries — and society — depends on our priorities.
Visualize the invisible
08/12/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says drawing attention to the problem is a fundamental part of any effective energy strategy.
A new day dawning
07/10/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says energy is finally making it to the top of the list of senior management’s concerns, and that the news about high energy costs isn't all bad.
Help wanted
06/16/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says we have energy answers, but wonders if and how we can reach full scale. When companies reach out to the market to find expertise, they all too often come up dry.
Stashing CO2
05/08/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth makes sense of carbon sequestration and offsets.
Blessing or curse?
04/03/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says there’s no question that U.S. climate regulation legislation could cause you pain if you're not adequately prepared.
Energy versus sustainability
03/07/2008
Sustainability is the new, hot career path with high levels of organizational visibility, a situation that doesn’t always bring out the best in people.
Energy, climate and food
02/08/2008
Energy Expert Peter Garforth says food processing plants have extra reasons to strategize energy.
2008: The year of energy integration?
01/11/2008
Energy expert Peter Garforth illustrates how combining forces leads to breakthroughs in energy productivity.
Energy’s “perfect storm”
12/17/2007
Energy Expert Peter Garforth questions why so many companies still refuse shelter in the midst of a brewing energy storm.
Why is best practice transfer so hard?
11/19/2007
We naturally assume our industrial and political leaders are scouring the planet for proven best practices, technologies and policies that could be implemented to reduce energy risks and capture benefits. In reality, this is rare. Why, and what can we do about it?
Here’s what energy management leadership looks like
10/12/2007
Take a look at one company's commitment to energy productivity and find out how visible senior leadership can affect the climate of energy management.
Recognition, rewards and consequences give an energy program credence
08/07/2007
The importance of effective rewards and recognition in a good energy management program can’t be overstated, but they’ll only be effective when they’re supported by the basics.
How one of the world’s most energy-intensive industries plans to survive
07/16/2007
As a CEO in an industry that contributes about 5% of all global greenhouse gas emissions, you might view the future with trepidation. Cement manufacturers are increasingly under scrutiny. To make matters worse, the chemistry of cement-making results in as much carbon-dioxide as the energy used to make it.
Energy benchmarking
06/13/2007
Defining and capturing data for energy indices is only the beginning of the process. Next, says Energy Expert Peter Garforth in his latest column, is identifying your motivation and establishing tracking. How does your company compare with competitors and industry averages?
How to look at energy use as a productivity index
05/10/2007
Seek a fine compromise between precision and usefulness when creating your corporate energy plan, says Peter Garforth in this month's Energy Expert column.
Germany, Denmark and China offer lessons on managing energy
04/11/2007
With the increasing concerns about climate change and the globalization of the energy market, management needs to be more aware of the interacting drivers of energy availability, cost and environmental regulation. Peter Garforth, P. Eng., shares his experiences traveling across the globe in his Energy Expert column.
Area-wide energy productivity
03/12/2007
Locating generation much closer to the likely demand reduces lines losses dramatically, and finding meaningful uses for heat improves fuel productivity, says Peter Garforth, in his Energy Expert column.
Should utilities bother about energy productivity?
02/14/2007
Managing energy productivity and greenhouse gas emissions is a common thread running through the habits of leading companies embracing eco-friendly approaches. It's proving to be a profitable venture too, says Peter Garforth in his latest Energy Expert column.
Negotiating for energy incentives
01/17/2007
Companies face three main dimensions of energy risk — unpredictable and probably rising prices, availability and reliability, and environmental impacts and costs. Energy Expert Peter Garforth examines how the surrounding community can help you manage these risks.
Prepare your company for climate change
12/13/2006
Energy programs must clearly encompass rising perceptions of risk, says Energy Expert Peter Garforth in his latest column.
Energy strategy triage
10/31/2006
Measuring energy performance in terms of cost per unit of saleable product or service highlights the facilities and businesses that are vulnerable to fluctuation in energy-related factors. Do you have a game plan for radically improving the energy productivity at these key sites?
Reflections from WEEC 2006
10/10/2006
The strategic importance of managing energy as both good business and the basis of a sustainable future seems to have made its way to many boardrooms, says Peter Garforth in his latest Energy Expert column. CEOs and energy managers are getting better at talking the talk.
Ensure breakthrough improvements in your energy management program
09/11/2006
Don't be lulled into the status quo when building your energy management program. Instead, invest in consultants that bring a new way of thinking to the same old problems, says Peter Garforth in his latest Energy Expert column.
Implementation fatigue
08/07/2006
The new market realities of higher and rising energy costs as well as global pressures to reduce fossil fuel intensity have made energy management tracking much more valuable. Learn how to keep energy productivity programs from running out of gas in Peter Garforth's latest Energy Expert column.
Per-gallon productivity
07/10/2006
It isn't unusual for plant managers to concentrate their energy savings plans on production processes and major commercial real estate, but it's the transportation energy costs that are probably higher than you think. Peter Garforth, in his monthly Energy Expert column, identifies the energy savings possible from better management of your fleet.
Integrating effective energy productivity solutions
06/17/2006
Is your plant satisfied with the status quo? Significant challenges to an integrated energy policy come from within.
Should you relax as energy prices dip?
06/12/2006
It's not unusual for plant managers to suffer from a severe case of amnesia as soon as energy prices begin to fall. In his monthly Energy Expert column, Peter Garforth explains why it's so important to remain diligent in cutting energy costs even as prices dip.
Embedded energy
05/05/2006
Calculating the costs of your energy management plan is not as simple as adding up your natural gas, electricity and fuel invoices. You can involve suppliers to minimize total cost.
A sound energy business plan
04/10/2006
The goals is a sustained energy plan that can produce cost-effective energy productivity gains. Use a familiar structure, draw on common resources and pick appropriate pilot projects when building an energy plan.
Energy and climate change: The executive’s quandary
02/14/2006
A good energy strategy can simultaneously support risk management, regulatory compliance and the bottom line.
Energy costs include more than the totals of utility bills
01/09/2006
Plant Services' Energy Expert Peter Garforth explains how different companies view what is included in their energy expenses and how that affects company policy.
Create and deploy an effective energy team
12/13/2005
How to overcome “Our people have higher priorities…” syndrome.
Energy projects are different
11/08/2005
How to overcome “We have more important places to invest” syndrome.
Sponsored Links
Plant Services Digital Edition
Access the entire print issue on-line and be notified each month via e-mail when your new issue is ready for you. Subscribe today.
- Featured White Papers
