PdM words of wisdom from the experts

Nov. 21, 2016
Top tips from Plant Services' series on how to restart a stalled predictive maintenance program.

Does this story sound familiar? You design and implement a predictive maintenance program with the best of intentions, nudging your team away from their reactive comfort zone to embrace a more proactive mindset, but after several months your team's forward motion grinds to a halt.

In a series of recent articles, contributing editor Sheila Kennedy sought out maintenance and reliability experts who have learned, sometimes through failure, what it takes to keep a PdM program alive and how to restart a program that has been unsuccessful. Below are notable quotes from this series:

“I have witnessed a few failures and walked into plants that have remnants of what was once a good program. Usually it was due to a combination of three things: The program manager failed to show the value PdM provided to the organization, the management changed, (and/or) there was insufficient knowledge and training.”
Joe Anderson, senior reliability manager at The Schwan Food Company

“They start out with great intentions, but the program is not implemented thoroughly or completely, or the program is downsized to the point of delivering little value as a result of a plantwide austerity or cost-cutting program.”
Tracy Strawn, president of oil and gas services at Marshall Institute

“When reliability practitioners have a vibration program but ‘don’t have enough time’ to use other PdM technologies, that’s when I know there are missed opportunities.”
Paul Dufresne, reliability improvement specialist

“Find the right person to lead or drive the effort – someone who is passionate about the technology and a firm believer in the program.”
Bob Kazar, director of reliability for operational excellence at The Wonderful Co.

“PdM will tell us what part is deteriorating, but we must employ other means to uncover and then rule out failure causes. All too often, the root of the problem is a lack of insistence on conscientiously implemented details."
Heinz P. Bloch, consulting engineer

“I have seen programs stall or fail because they do not have the talent or knowledge to use the technology. The how, when, and where to utilize the technologies is all a part of being successful."
Larry Hoing, senior manager of asset care at Wells Enterprises

“The current state did not happen overnight, and you need to continually follow up to get it back on track. It’s all about being an ambassador for reliability.”
Ron Bitely, global E/I reliability manager at Arizona Chemical, a Kraton company

Sponsored Recommendations

Limitations of MERV Ratings for Dust Collector Filters

Feb. 23, 2024
It can be complicated and confusing to select the safest and most efficient dust collector filters for your facility. For the HVAC industry, MERV ratings are king. But MERV ratings...

The Importance of Air-To-Cloth Ratio when Selecting Dust Collector Filters

Feb. 23, 2024
Selecting the right filter cartridges for your application can be complicated. There are a lot of things to evaluate and consider...like air-to-cloth ratio. When your filters ...

ASHRAE Standard 199 for Evaluating Dust Collection Systems

Feb. 23, 2024
This standard ensures dust collection systems are tested under real-world conditions, measuring a dust collector's emissions, pressure drop, and compressed air usage. Learn why...

Dust Collector Explosion Protection

Feb. 23, 2024
Combustible dust explosions are a serious risk, and an unprotected dust collection system can be a main cause. Learn what NFPA-compliant explosion protection you need to keep ...