Interested in linking to "Boiler control"?
You may use the Headline, Deck, Byline and URL of this article on your Web site. To link to this article, select and copy the HTML code below and paste it on your own Web site.
In practice, gas-, oil- and coal-burning boilers don't mix fuel and air perfectly, even under the best conditions. Figure 1 shows that keeping excess air within a specific range ensures complete combustion and reduces heat loss. Effective regulation of excess air:
Improves heat-transfer rates.
Provides advance warning of flue-gas problems.
Offers substantial fuel savings.
Knowing the oxygen concentration in the flue gas improves combustion control. Adding an oxygen trim-control module allows:
Tighter control of excess air.
Faster return to setpoint following disturbances.
Tighter emission control.
Easier carbon monoxide or opacity override.
Optimize excess air
Figure 1:Excess air must be kept within a suitable range to ensure complete combustion and reduce heat loss.
Air before fuel
Figure 2:A cross-limiting combustion circuit allows firing multiple fuels simultaneously without risking excess fuel.
Modulating control improves boiler operation by monitoring the steam or hot-water line to produce a continuous control signal that determines the fuel input. Reductions in steam pressure or water temperature lead to an increase in firing rate. The advantages of burner modulation for combustion control include:
Continuously matching fuel and air rates to demand.
Closer steam pressure or water temperature tolerances.
Improving boiler efficiency.
Reducing the weighted average flue-gas temperature.
A cross-limiting combustion-control strategy ensures there can never be a dangerous air/fuel ratio in the system. This feature always increases the airflow before increasing the fuel flow and always reduces the fuel flow before allowing the airflow to drop. Figure 2 illustrates the concept. The scheme easily accommodates firing multiple fuels simultaneously. Cross-limiting combustion control is highly effective and can:
Optimize fuel consumption.
Reduce the risk of explosion.
Adapt to variations in fuel and air supplies rapidly.
Better satisfy steam demand.
Applying additional dynamic limits to air and fuel setpoints can achieve additional savings by maintaining the air/fuel ratio within narrow limits during and after transition. This reduces heat loss by protecting against the demand signal making the air/
fuel ratio too lean.
Boiler drum-level control
Boiler drum-level control is critical. Too low a level may expose boiler tubes, which overheats and damages them. Too high a level may interfere with separating moisture from steam, which reduces boiler efficiency and carries moisture into the process or turbine. The drum-level controller maintains the level at constant steam load. There are three options for drum-level control single-element, two-element and three-element drum-level control.
Single-element control is the simplest but least effective form of control (see Figure 3). A proportional signal or process variable (PV) signal generates a correction that's proportional to the deviation from setpoint. The output controls the boiler's feedwater valve. Single-element control requires one analog input and one analog output. Because there's no relationship between drum level and steam or feedwater flow, it can be applied only to a single feed pump on a single boiler supplying a relatively stable load. Also, the swell effect may render control inadequate.
Figure 3:Drum-level control with a single-element module.
Figure 4:Drum-level control with a two-element module.
Figure 5:Drum-level control with a three-element module.
Two-element drum-level control can best be applied to a single drum boiler if the feedwater is at a constant pressure. Two-element control (see Figure 4) includes the same level element used for the single-element configuration but has an added steam-flow element that provides a density-corrected mass flow-rate signal to control the feedwater flow. Two elements offer tighter control of drum level. The steam flow acts as a feed-forward signal to allow faster level adjustments. This gives an immediate feedwater response to load changes while the level controller corrects any imbalance between steam mass flow and feedwater flow that arises from:
Blowdown variations caused by changes in dissolved solids.
Variation in feedwater supply pressure.
Steam leaks in the steam circuit.
Three-element drum-level control is suited for handling variable feedwater pressure or multiple boilers with multiple feedwater pumps (see Figure 5). The three elements in this system handle level, steam and feedwater flow. The level and steam elements correct for unmeasured disturbances arising from boiler blowdown, as well as leaks in the boiler and superheater tubes. The feedwater flow element responds rapidly to variations in feedwater demand that arise from the steam flow-rate feed-forward signal and feedwater pressure or flow fluctuations.